DA case: Court seeks CBI reply on Ajay Chautala’s transfer plea

Harsh K. Sharma and Vaibhavi Sharma

22 Feb 2017

DA case: Court seeks CBI reply on Ajay Chautala’s transfer plea

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court has sought the CBI’s response on a plea by INLD leader Ajay Chautala, who is serving 10-year jail term in a teachers’ recruitment scam case, for transfer of a disproportionate assets case against him to another court.

District Judge Ravinder Kaur issued notice to CBI on the plea and listed it for filing of reply and hearing arguments on March 3.

While hearing a similar transfer application by co- accused Abhimanyu Singh, the court summoned S L Goyal, a CBI witness in the DA case, on a claim that he was a relative of the presiding officer hearing the matter.

The district judge noted that the concerned presiding officer, in his comments, had not specifically denied that the witness is not known to him.

CBI prosecutor said despite several attempts, the witness could not be contacted and it was necessary to get information for him as to whether he was known to any other CBI judge posted in the district.

CBI chargesheet: BCI members wanted Rs 13+ lakh total bribes as 3 now in special court dock

Harsh K. Sharma

19 Nov 2015

CBI chargesheet: BCI members wanted Rs 13+ lakh total bribes as 3 now in special court dock

Bar Council of India (BCI) associate managing trustee Rajinder Singh Rana and former vice chairman Raju Dhanapal Raj were tried before a special CBI court in Delhi yesterday, for allegedly accepting a bribe of Rs 6 lakh to approve Global Law College in Ghaziabad.

Prosoll Law Inc advocate Harsh Kumar Sharma acted for Rana and Raj, and advocate Mohinder Singh Saini acted for the third accused Manish Tyagi before special CBI judge Anju Bajaj Chandna. Tyagi was the member of the advisory council of the Ghaziabad college in 2010 – the time when the offence was allegedly committed.

Public Prosecutor PK Dogra was acting for the state and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

CBI judge Chandna charged Rana, Raj and Tyagi for conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and for illegal gratification under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988.

According to the chargesheet, Rana and Raj had allegedly demanded Rs 15 lakh from the law school’s chairperson BS Satyarthy at the time when the law school had submitted its application for inspection, and had again demanded Rs 15 lakh from Satyarthy when it was time for Rana and Raja to give submit their inspection report.

The chargesheet also alleges that Tyagi was the middleman who had negotiated with Rana to reduce the bribe amount from Rs 15 lakh to Rs 6 lakh, and had then finally delivered Rs 6 lakh to Rana.

Satyarthy, who turned “approver” in the case, made witness statements to confirm the offence, the chargesheet also stated. The charges in this case were framed against the accused on 15 September.

The CBI special court is currently in the process of taking evidence and cross examination in the case, with the CBI claiming phone wiretap evidence of Rana and other evidence.

All three accused, Rana, Raj and Tyagi, pleaded not guilty according to the chargesheet.